Making art, not a product


There are two articles about the art in mass media, I’ve read – “The Avant-Garde and Kitsch” and “The Arts and the Mass Media”. Those texts are about “kitsch” – the type of art made by formulas, and about its role in art and society. The first one made me think “Oh, there are some issues in the modern world”, the second one turned it into “And so what?”.

I really hate blaming modern society. I could even say blaming it is popular in a way. But yet I should admire that we do have problems with kitsch. I really enjoy watching some cinema and cartoon critics, and I often hear similar statements to “Kitsch is mechanical and operates by formulas” (Willette, 2011), especially cartoons. The statement is not art but a product. Like companies are not interested in some originality or new thoughts, and it is much easier to make sequels by a formula of less effort and much profit to make sure the money will be earned. And it is easier for the audience too – parents are taking children to watch a movie with 100% friendly content, being sure no tricky questions will be asked after.

Of course, it is an issue. As long as people are happy about the content, and companies are earning money, there would be no point to change the system and the formula. And there is less space to original ideas that need people, effort, and money to be created. Even those type of things that could be made by one person are going to be drawn and never seen in thousands of kitschy copies.
But could we say kitsch is “bad” and shouldn’t be even considered as art? Well, I always was pretty liberal to any art forms and ideas. Everything has the right to be called art. Even if we are talking about the pop-music, that could be blamed by musicians, it is too easy, and you shouldn’t put much effort and to have the talent to create it, it is still may sound good, and someone to enjoy it. Everything is fine as long we are not forced to make kitsch and only kitsch. And destroying it would be a huge loss. “...rejection of the mass-produced arts is not, as critics think, a defense of culture but an attack on it” (Alloway, 1958).

Kitsch might be inspiring. A lot of people I know started their art by copying something popular and soulless, to developing it in something original and soulful in the future. Also, kitsch has a part of merit art is everywhere nowadays. It is not anymore about your choice, but about having no chance to ignore it. Even if mostly it is about kitsch, it still an art, and it is a chance for people to discover themselves as artists.

Of course, nowadays we have some problems with kitsch, being taken as the best model of mass media art creation. It imposes itself and sometimes even truly displaces other art. But it also creates people being displeased upon it and creating something better. It also inspires people to get started with art so some of them could understand repeating kitsch is a road to nowhere and changing the style and the goal to something bigger than it.


Reference list:
Willette, J. (2011) Arthistoryunstuffed. Available at: https://arthistoryunstuffed.com/the-avant-garde-and-kitsch-1939/ (Accessed:18 April 2019)

Alloway, L. (1958) Warholstars. Available at: https://warholstars.org/arts_mass-media_lawrence_alloway.html (Accessed:18 April 2019)

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий