Since I am still not sure how exactly will I interpret my research, there might be several theoretical concepts. But I would like to focus on the one concrete interpretation I find most interesting – zine. Most of the zines I’ve seen had only illustrations on one topic attached together as a small book, while I would like to make it a real magazine, with articles, games, letters, posters and maybe comics. It should mimic kids' magazines but on the punishments and parents-abuse topics.
I think it is really in the spirit of post-modernism, and it is also something
I would definitely enjoy making, as a person who has been making school
newspapers, who loves to draw comics, and who read lots of literature on the topic
of raising children.
So why is it post-modernism? First of all because of its irony and outrageousness.
Making something that looks as kid’s magazine but about parents’ violence? It
seems a bit confusing, weird and unrepeated. Something on the border of dark humour
and post-irony. As an example – I am planning to add some word puzzles about
items kids could be beaten with, or colouring pictures asking to draw bruises on
a kid depending on a story about how he was punished. I also thought about making a
little maze that will show what kind of mental disease a child will probably have
in future life.
Another aspect, that might describe my zine as a post-modern, is multiple interpretations
and pluralism. The topic of corporal and other punishments would be raised in lots
of different and playful ways, so people might understand it differently. Some
might think that I am trying to normalize punishments. Others would understand
the irony and absurd and think about the zine as about punishments critique.
I also planned to add some “letters” and open answers kids have written in the questionnaire
I’ve made. And since not all kids shared their sad stories, and some thought
punishments should be in their relationships with parents, that will also
provide different opinions on the topic.
The last thing that might describe my zine as a post-modern art is a plagiarism. I’ve
made a little research of my old magazines and figured out lots of comics and
other illustrations are actually the same illustrations, with several emotions
or details changed. For example, in my sponge bob magazine, all of the
illustrations were official drawings of the characters taken from the internet
or the cartoon itself. For the plot of the comic creators of the magazine added a few white lines on shoes as laces.
As for my zine, probably I would not add plagiarism but would try to use the
same illustrations several times with few changes.
Additionally, before I wanted to interpret my research as a papier mashe or a
book. I guess it would fit the post-modern theory as well because it has the
same idea in it.
If it would be a papier mashe, as I originally planned it to be, it would be considered
a post-modern piece of art because of its multiple interpretations and mix of
low and high cultures. Since people figures wouldn’t have any emotions, clothes
and etc., people would have more freedom of imagination to interpret the artwork
depending on their personality, background and feelings.
If it would be a book, it would have the same criteria as the zine, but outrageousness. The irony would still be there, mostly because of the illustrations, since I’ve
planned to make them in cartoony and childish style. Interpretations would also
have a place because of the different narrators and different opinions, but since
I was planning to prove there is no need to punish children in my book, it
wouldn’t be that strong. As an opposite, am not planning to make my zine that
narrow and won’t focus on proving my point.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий