Tradition
of European painting
~1400-1900
"Way
we see them in 20th century, as nobody saw before" (photos of paintings?)
Process
of seeing is not spontaneous.
Describes
how the eye works and also similar
how a camera works
We
can see things at one place -> changed with the camera
invention
The way only camera
can see things
Free from the
bounders of time and space
Camera changed not
only what but also how we see things
Camera reproduces paintings
Paintings surrounded
by different objects, sounds, colours (there are always different people in
museums what also influence the atmosphere - is it better?)
Seeing in context of
my own life
Originally paintings
- part of the biding they are designed for
Paintings -
buildings memory
Uniqueness of
paintings are also in the places they are located
Icons
Images comes to you,
you do not go to them
Paintings became a
sort of information
They are still
difference between reproductions and the only original paintings
Or not?
Religiosity around
paintings are replacement for the lost when the camera made them reproducible.
Camera multiplied
meanings and destroyed unique original one (the thing I like in paintings now
is they could be understood differently, but maybe it wasn't possible before,
especially when paintings were made instead of family photos, for example)
Works of art have
lost and gained because of that
Most
important - images of paintings are still silent and still, but lines of the screen
are never still (is it still relevant?) and pages of a book
Stillness and
silence makes a corridor between the moment it represents and present
Using movement and
sound
The camera shows the concrete part of the painting and changes the meaning
It might be many
ways to show painting (reminds a channel on youtube where girl makes trailers
from one movie or cartoon but representing it in different genres by force of a
montage)
(aren't people making the same things by
themselves while looking on paintings irl - reducing the whole painting to small logical parts?)
Paintings
might change a lot because of
music (music can changes many things radically, it is really powerful when it comes to emotions)
(Before
the music plays he says Van Gogh Killed himself after this painting. Isn't paintings history is the one who changes our opinion on it? Should
we try to get closer to the
master to understand the painting, or we should keep our own feelings upon it
without knowing what sense was probably placed into the drawing?)
Meaning could be manipulated and transformed
It
could be changed but what you see before/after or
around (not only books but museums as well) +changing TV channels
It is not negative
if we realize it
Images could be used
as words
False mystification
that surrounds art
Personal
understating of art and how knowing nothing about the history of the painting the
sense might be changed
Pictures like words
rather holy relics
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий